|
A radically usage-based account of the development of the English “epistemic” be bound to constructionDirk Noëlabstract : oralCognitionsciencesconf.org:tam-e2016:110525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developmental patterns of the use of modal forms by Turkish EFL learners and the potential contribution of explicit knowledgeDogus Oksuz, Kenneth Fordyceabstract : oralAcquisitionsciencesconf.org:tam-e2016:110851
|
|
|
Epistemic control and the TAM-E systems in English and Spanish: A cognitive and cross-linguistic perspective on Evidentiality.Juana I. Marin-Arreseabstract : oralEvidentialitysciencesconf.org:tam-e2016:110855
|
|
|
|
Evidentiality and modality in Old Catalan. A diachronic cognitive approach to the semantics of modal verbsAndreu Sentíabstract : oralCognitionsciencesconf.org:tam-e2016:108938
|
|
Feature reassembly across closely-related languages: L1 French vs. L1 Portuguese learning of L2 Spanish Past TensesJose Amenos-Pons, Aoife Ahern, Pedro Guijarro-Fuentesabstract : oralAcquisitionsciencesconf.org:tam-e2016:110542
|
Grammatical aspect, tense, and gesture in French, German, and RussianAlan Cienki, Dominique Boutet, Aliyah Morgenstern, Cornelia Müller, Ray Becker, Olga Iriskhanova, Valeriia Denisovaabstract : oralAspectsciencesconf.org:tam-e2016:110761
|
Grammaticalisation and L2 Acquisition of Evidentiality: a corpus-based pilot study on English and FrenchPascale Leclercq, Eric Melacabstract : oralAcquisitionsciencesconf.org:tam-e2016:110902
|
Identifying usage patterns in corpus data: A multifactorial account of epistemic and evidential markers in English and FrenchKarolina Krawczak, Gilles Col, Frédérique Mélanie-Becquet, Thierry Poibeauabstract : oralCognitionsciencesconf.org:tam-e2016:110737
|
Interaction between tense-aspect, epistemicity and evidentiality. Perspectives from Tibetic languageNicolas Tournadreabstract : oralPlenarysciencesconf.org:tam-e2016:117315
|
|
|
|
|
|
Le concept cognitif de borne doit-il être mathématisé dans le système du TAM ?Zlatka Guentchéva, Jean-Pierre Desclésabstract : oralTAM-Esciencesconf.org:tam-e2016:110662
|
Le conditionnel « reportatif » et le rapport entre l'évidentialité, la modalité et la non-prise en charge. Proposition d'analyse nouvelle.Patrick DENDALEabstract : oralModalitysciencesconf.org:tam-e2016:112404
|
|
Les emplois temporels des verbes modaux: le cas de devoir français et pidama (‘devoir') estonienAnu Treikelder, Marri Amonabstract : oralTensesciencesconf.org:tam-e2016:110964
|
|
|
Non-finiteness and evidentiality: the Lithuanian accusativus cum participio in a cross-linguistic perspectiveAurelija Usoniene, Nigel Vincentabstract : oralEvidentialitysciencesconf.org:tam-e2016:110976
|
On the development of modal meanings in Lithuanian: the case of reikėti ‘need' and turėti ‘have to'Erika Jasionytė-Mikučionienėabstract : oralTAM-Esciencesconf.org:tam-e2016:110864
|
Polyfunctionality vs. compositionality and the tense/aspect – modality divide: descriptive, comparative/typological and theoretical issuesPatrick Caudal, James Bednallabstract : oralTAM-Esciencesconf.org:tam-e2016:110841
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Ecuadorian Spanish benefactive and the inherent aspect of the verbpaz gonzalez, Martine Bruil, Judith Leeuwenabstract : oralTAM-Esciencesconf.org:tam-e2016:110705
|
|
|
|
|
The results of an unequal language contact: Verbal prefixes as perfectivity markers in Latvian and LivonianSantra Jantunenabstract : oralAspectsciencesconf.org:tam-e2016:110947
|
Une zone de contact entre modalité épistémique et évidentialité : le futur concessif en italien et sa traduction en françaisLaura Baranziniabstract : oralTensesciencesconf.org:tam-e2016:110893
|
|
|